Ubuntu Sverige

Pink Panther skrev:Det är korkat.

HakanS skrev:

Pink Panther skrev:Det är korkat.

När använde du Aptitude senast?
Själv har jag aldrig använt det under de 4 år som ubuntuanvändare.

HakanS skrev:

Pink Panther skrev:Det är korkat.

När använde du Aptitide senast?
Själv har jag aldrig använt det under de 4 år som ubuntuanvändare.

mcNisse skrev:Om det inte spelar någon roll. Hur fixar man till beroendekonflikter utan aptitude? Phulease

pun skrev:För de som vill ha kvar Aptitude så har en av U-Fs moderatorer startat en bug....

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sour ... bug/592336

Bara att klicka på Add me too.....

NOTES ON THE DECISION
(This is based on a conversation with Colin Watson on IRC and the references given)
The initial rationale is basically size; approximately 2MB (which in the scope of things are very precious on the liveCD) will be gained by removing tasksel and aptitude.

The initial reason why aptitude was included in ubuntu was that the desktop installer (ubiquity) depended on it, but now the desktop installer has been rewritten to not require it unless in particular cases, and hence it goes.

The alternate install CD will still install aptitude and tasksel, since the debian-installer which is used in installation requires it.

Likewise the server install of ubuntu will still include it (presumably also since it uses debian-installer)

This was part of the "Maverick Spring Cleaning" which was discussed during UDS-M and is specified here: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu ... g-cleaning
As "Install tasksel and aptitude dynamically"

More info here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsTeam ... ngCleaning
"We could substantially reduce the size of the minimal seed by installing tasksel and aptitude dynamically, so that we don't end up with them on live-installed systems. We will still need to keep tasksel in the server seed."