Torvalds om GPL3
Postat: 14 jun 2007, 21:28
http://www.linux.com/enterprise/07/06/1 ... =41&tid=12
" I was impressed in the sense that it was a hell of a lot better than the disaster that were the earlier drafts.
I still think GPLv2 is simply the better license.
I consider dual-licensing unlikely (and technically quite hard), but at least _possible_ in theory. I have yet to see any actual *reasons* for licensing under the GPLv3, though. All I've heard are shrill voices about "tivoization" (which I expressly think is ok) and panicked worries about Novell-MS (which seems way overblown, and quite frankly, the argument seems to not so much be about the Novell deal, as about an excuse to push the GPLv3)."
Svenska IDG
http://www.idg.se/2.1085/1.111587
Ingen ny licens
http://www.idg.se/2.1085/1.111927
Linuxwatch
http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS5379489292.html
Lite hårdare diskussioner för den som vill fördjupa sig
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&r=1&b=200706&w=2
Sökning efter eget behag på ämne eller författare.
Tråd låst !
" I was impressed in the sense that it was a hell of a lot better than the disaster that were the earlier drafts.
I still think GPLv2 is simply the better license.
I consider dual-licensing unlikely (and technically quite hard), but at least _possible_ in theory. I have yet to see any actual *reasons* for licensing under the GPLv3, though. All I've heard are shrill voices about "tivoization" (which I expressly think is ok) and panicked worries about Novell-MS (which seems way overblown, and quite frankly, the argument seems to not so much be about the Novell deal, as about an excuse to push the GPLv3)."
Svenska IDG
http://www.idg.se/2.1085/1.111587
Ingen ny licens
http://www.idg.se/2.1085/1.111927
Linuxwatch
http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS5379489292.html
Lite hårdare diskussioner för den som vill fördjupa sig
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&r=1&b=200706&w=2
Sökning efter eget behag på ämne eller författare.
Tråd låst !