Torvalds om GPL3

[Okänd]

http://www.linux.com/enterprise/07/06/1 ... =41&tid=12

"    I was impressed in the sense that it was a hell of a lot better than the disaster that were the earlier drafts.

    I still think GPLv2 is simply the better license.

    I consider dual-licensing unlikely (and technically quite hard), but at least _possible_ in theory. I have yet to see any actual *reasons* for licensing under the GPLv3, though. All I've heard are shrill voices about "tivoization" (which I expressly think is ok) and panicked worries about Novell-MS (which seems way overblown, and quite frankly, the argument seems to not so much be about the Novell deal, as about an excuse to push the GPLv3)."

Svenska IDG
http://www.idg.se/2.1085/1.111587

Ingen ny licens
http://www.idg.se/2.1085/1.111927

Linuxwatch
http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS5379489292.html

Lite hårdare diskussioner för den som vill fördjupa sig
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&r=1&b=200706&w=2

Sökning efter eget behag på ämne eller författare.

Tråd låst !